Christopher Horwood
I used to judge myself as a fairly easy customer when it came to mattresses. I grew up on squeaky old British brass bedsteads, and mattresses with very ‘evident’ springs. I am fine with sleeping on a sofa or futon, and am reasonably relaxed about mattresses (although I do get distressed at anything too soft and suffocating). Recently, though, mattresses have been on my mind.
First, I have become aware of the huge environmental impact of mattresses. Once you start noticing them, fly-tipped and skipped mattresses are everywhere; foam is a problem, and I cringe at the idea of the materials that go into the average mattress. Secondly, my husband has suffered from various spinal ailments of late. So, whilst I might be capable of sleeping on the floor, my bed mate does not share this circumstance. And now, with an extension complete, we have a new bedroom, and a reason to acquire a new mattress (without throwing one away).
Shopping around, I felt that there was a gulf between the very cheapest, and therefore the most disposable and environmentally damaging mattresses; and the ones that have an excellent environmental record. My current mattress was probably around £300; we will keep it for the spare room, but it isn’t ideal. I would love to invest in a Hästens mattress – a lifetime (at least) investment, but at £10,000 or so, it is not an option for most. That’s why I was interested in seeing if one of the new online mattress retailers would offer a product that fills this gap.
Emma’s NextGen Premium Mattress: is it worth buying?
As a hybrid mattress that has a higher proportion of pocket-springs-to-foam than others, it does feel closer to the traditional ‘sprung mattress’ than some of its competitor hybrid mattresses, which I really like. It feels properly supportive and structured, and that, to me, makes it less likely to end up in a skip when someone moves house. Plus, the four layers of memory foam on top of the springs does give it that suppleness that makes memory foam so appealing.
Due to this greater proportion of springs, this mattress has 62% less foam, and the springs themselves are made from 51% recycled steel. Overall, they calculate (using a tool called Planetly by OneTrust) that this mattress has a 54% lower carbon footprint per kilogram than a foam mattress. It’s a decent start.
I would say this mattress is on the firm side. But this suits me, and would be a great choice for the many sleepers who like firm support. Particularly, those who tend to sleep on their back are much more likely to benefit from a firm mattress. Those who tend to sleep on their side need a mattress that has the right combination of support and flex so that their shoulders and hips can slightly sink into the surface, maintaining the straight line of the spine. This is the result that I was looking for for my husband, who does tend to sleep on his side, and needs to look after his spine.
